Showing posts with label Liberal Democrats. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Liberal Democrats. Show all posts

Dr Sarah Hill, the Lib Dem PCC candidate for Leicestershire


The Harborough Mail has an interview with Dr Sarah Hill, who will be the Liberal Democrat candidate in next month's police and crime commissioner here in Leicesterhire:
Market Harborough resident Dr Sarah Hill, the only woman in the contest, said: “The last (Conservative) Police Commissioner spent over £1 million per year on their office. 
“By minimising the costs of the central office, I want to spend more money on operations, putting more resources into the frontline where the public needs them.” 
Dr Hill, a former Robert Smyth pupil and current Harborough District and Leicestershire County councillor, said the last Police Commissioner spent too much on employing people in strategic and consultative roles. 
She said she is standing on a platform of challenging the status quo by reducing central office costs and creating a more visible presence of 
police on the streets. 
“The biggest complaint I get from local residents is that they don’t see as many police officers as often as they used to” she said.
Last time, having agreed to their introduction under the coalition agreement, the party did not field a candidate in many of the contests.

Mark Pack brings news that things are better this time.
Share:

Lord Bonkers' Diary: What the Liberal Democrats should do is...

Lord Bonkers concludes his visit to the United States.

As for we Liberal Democrats...

Then there is the Labour Party, as the New Party is calling itself these days. They need to dump Jeremy Corbyn, Christopher Robin Milne, Chairman Mao and all that crew and find themselves someone who can connect with the workers, as they flatter themselves they used to do. Frank Byers’ granddaughter is Terribly Keen, some military fellow called Jarvis has the skills you need in a closely fought by-election, but I am not holding my breath.

As for we Liberal Democrats, we need an ingenious new plan that will see us returned to the front rank of politics. What we should do is… Dash it all! My flight has just been called.

Lord Bonkers was Liberal MP for Rutland South West, 1906-10

Earlier this week in Lord Bonkers' Diary...

  • Do you know New Rutland?
  • My old Friend Rising Star
  • The New Rutland Primaries
  • Liam Fox? My dear, I screamed!
  • Share:

    Nick Clegg to hold public meeting in Harborough on 19 May

    Nick Clegg will be speaking on Europe at a public meeting on Europe in Oadby on Thursday 19 May.

    Also featuring Dinesh Dhamija, the founder of Ebookers, the meeting will take place at Beauchamp College with a 5.30pm for 6pm start.

    My old friend Liberal Democrat councillor Phil Knowles says:
    "Zuffar Haq and the team are working very hard to make this a successful evening and I have no doubt that tickets will be in high demand. My recommendation is to book early to secure your place at the event and to avoid disappointment.''
    To book a place at the meeting, please email Linda Broadley.
    Share:

    Lord Bonkers' Diary: My old friend Rising Star

    A second day in the US with Lords Bonkers. Today he meets an old friend who once featured prominently in these diaries.

    My old friend Rising Star

    It seems the Red Indian influence remains strong in New Rutland to this day. Who should I meet when I arrived in Gladstone, the state capital, but my old friend Rising Star, at one time the Liberal Democrat MP for Winchester?

    We went for a firewater and he told me that he had given up politics and returned to the trade of his forefathers: he is dealing in animal skins ("Um nice little earner.") When I asked him what he had made from afar of the travails of our party he replied with characteristic sagacity: "Heap big trouble."

    Lord Bonkers was Liberal MP for Rutland South West, 1906-10

    Earlier this week in Lord Bonkers' Diary...
    Share:

    Liberator on the Gurling review


    My copy of the new Liberator arrived this morning. I have already started serialising Lord Bonkers' latest diary, but I thought I would share some of Radical Bulletin with you too.

    The lead item looks at the Gurling review of the Liberal Democrats' performance at the 2015 general election:
    James Gurling and his colleagues have pulled few punches. If their report has a weakness it's that it all too well reflects the general election campaign's fundamental mistake of seeing political problems and offering organisational solutions ... 
    The elephant in the room throughout ... is Nick Clegg himself, Its conclusions painfully reinforce the now clearer view that he lacked the political experience for the job having had one term as an MEP - so semi-detatched from UK politics - and only two years as an MP before becoming leader, in both cases parachuted into safe berths.
    I am sure you would like to read more, but to do so you will have to subscribe to Liberator.

    Radical Bulletin, incidentally, was originally a separate publication, latterly edited by John Tilley and Ralph Bancroft.

    It merged with Liberator in the early 1980s, where it survives to this day as a section of the magazine.
    Featured on Liberal Democrat Voice
    Think of the two publications as the radical Liberal equivalent of Whizzer and Chips.
    Share:

    Six of the Best 583

    Andrew Grice reminds us that David Cameron and George Osborne should not forget the Lib Dems know where the bodies are buried.

    Jeremy Corbyn is "acting as though he is the leader of a 3rd or 4th party, rather than leader of the opposition," says William Barter.

    "As Milne walked down a corridor, the six-foot colleague approached from the other direction. They smashed into each other, sending Milne flying, along with the papers he was carrying. 'Seumas was in shock,' recalls an onlooker. 'No one had ever done that to him before. He expected people to show deference to him.'" Alex Wickham profiles the Winchester-educated Stalinist who is Labour's executive director of strategy and communications.

    A reader sent me a link to Futility Closet, where Alfred Kahn's concept of the "tyranny of small decisions" is discussed.

    Hunter Oatman-Stanford takes us to Scarfolk, a strange land built on the public information films made to terrify children in the 1970s.

    "In the 1960s, trip boats from Little Venice would take extended tours across the Thames into the depths of Peckham and Camberwell, and even in the 1970s, some insisted the canal should be saved." Peter Watts on the loss of the Grand Surrey Canal.
    Share:

    Lord Bonkers on the by-election for a Lib Dem hereditary peer

    The sad death of Eric Avebury means there has to be a by-election to choose a new Liberal Democrat hereditary peer.

    A BBC News report suggests there will be two candidates: John Russell (the current Earl Russell and the son of the much-missed Conrad Russell) and John Thurso (former member of the Lords and former MP for Caithness and Sutherland).

    But then the electorate is barely larger than the number of candidates:
    Three current Lib Dem hereditaries are entitled to vote: Lord Addington, the descendent of a Conservative MP from the 1880s; the Earl of Glasgow, the descendent of one of the Scottish Commissioners who negotiated the 1703 Union of the kingdoms of Scotland and England; and the Earl of Oxford and Asquith, who is directly descended from the Liberal Prime Minister H H Asquith.
    Or should that be four current Lib Dem hereditaries?

    Lord Bonkers holds a Rutland peerage, which means he is sometimes overlooked by the pundits, but he is determined to vote in this election.

    I don't know which way he will vote, but he did remark at dinner the other night that "the Russells always come good in the end" and that "this Thurso fella needs to make up his mind which House he wants to sit in".

    He also said that a donation to the Bonkers' Home for Well-Behaved Orphans before the votes are cast on 19 April would be "a Terribly Nice Gesture".

    Thanks to Mark Pack.
    Share:

    Schools are being nationalised so they can be privatised

    As Stephen Tall rightly says, the announcement in the Budget that all schools will be obliged to become academies amounts to the nationalisation of education.

    And as John Elledge shows, that nationalisation includes the biggest appropriation of Church land since the Reformation.

    What is going on?

    I think I put my finger on it back in 2007 when I reviewed Reinventing the State - the social liberal riposte to the Orange Book - for the Guardian.

    I suggested that Liberal Democrat activists would:
    appreciate the way Huhne's vision of a rich diversity of local provision contrasts with the Tory idea of popular schools taking over the rest: "It's been a good half for the school: the match with Harrow was won, and St Custard's was purchased through a leveraged buy out."
    That sounds like me attributing my own eccentric enthusiasms to the party as a whole, and I have forgotten what became of the idea of popular schools taking over the rest.

    But it was clear back in 2007 that the Conservatives believes schools should be run as much like private companies as possible.

    Hence the recent emphasis on chains of academies. Hence the Budget's removal of parent governors as part of its nationalisation of schools.

    What I fear will come next is the gradual privatisation of what the Treasury has nationalised.

    As John Elledge says,
    Which schools have held out against academisation? They're disproportionately small (larger ones are more likely to be able to afford in house IT teams and so forth). They're disproportionately likely to be primaries (secondaries are larger). And they're disproportionately likely to be rated outstanding (if it ain't broke, don't fix it). 
    And what type of schools are disproportionately likely to be small but outstanding primaries? Faith schools.
    Taking on the churches my look a bridge to far even for George Osborne, but it is easy to imagine a campaign against small schools.

    We will be told that they cannot offer the facilities and breadth of curriculum that our children deserve. Expect to hear the 'global race' invoked.

    And what will become of these closed small schools? Just think of the prime building land they occupy in the centre of sought-after villages.

    The forced application of a business ethos to education will result in narrowed educational provision and a diminished life in many communities, even if the schools stay in the public sector.

    But is hard to resist the prediction that, at some point in the process, the Treasury will take the opportunity of cashing in and selling off schools to the private sector.
    Share:

    The first time I saw George Osborne



    In the days when I wrote a weekly column for Liberal Democrat News - in the days when there was a Liberal Democrat News - I had a Press Gallery pass at the Palace of Westminster.

    Everyone said the place resembled nothing so much as a public school. Not having attended such an establishment myself, I was not really qualified to judge.

    But the it certainly resembled what I imagined a public school to be like, albeit largely without the roasting over fires or flagellation.

    One day in 2001 I saw an improbably  youthful figure on the opposition front bench. He really did look like a cheeky fourth-former sitting in the prefects' seats. I expected him to be booted out as soon as they turned up.

    I asked a Press Gallery attendant (they know everyone by sight) who he was.

    "That's George Osborne,"he explained.
    Share:

    Six of the Best 580

    "Eric's family hope you can join them for an afternoon to celebrate his life and work at The Royal Institution, 2.00pm on Thursday 30th June 2016. There will be a number of guest speakers, audio visual clips and music, followed by light refreshments." Details of the memorial service for Eric Avebury,

    "I wish I'd never decided to work in an immigration detention centre," says an anonymous article on politics.co.uk.

    Stephen Williams presents an electoral history of Bristol Liberal Democrats 1973-2016.

    "Newsagents reached parts of the population that most booksellers and stationers hadn’t previously: the working class. Newsagents could provide a one-stop shop for working-class autodidacts in the interwar period." Misplacedhabits on the need for a history of newsagents' shops.

    "Get Carter was different from all other films in that it somehow ‘belonged’ to the north-east – projecting and validating a tough-but-tender image of the region that chimed with the area’s self-romanticising view of itself." Neil Young on a great film, 45 years on.

    Railway Maniac on a little piece of Lincolnshire railway history: the Allington Chord.


    Share:

    Liberal Democrats back all-women shortlists - LATEST


    Featured on Liberal Democrat Voice"Put on a decent suit, tie up your tie and sing the national anthem."

    Photo by Matt Downey.
    Share:

    The Liberal Democrats are still a long way from OMOV



    Harry Hayfield has an article on Liberal Democrat Voice about the motion before the Liberal Democrat Conference this weekend that would legalise the use of cannabis.

    I don't agree with the line he takes on that, but I was struck by something he wrote:
    I have lived with my grandparents all my life and as a result, especially since 2005 as I have been their registered carer, I have moved wherever and whenever they have moved and this means that since I became a Liberal Democrat in 1992, I have been all over the place. 
    However, there is one small downside to this and that is being able to get to big Lib Dem events. In those 24 years I have only managed to attend one regional conference, three Welsh conferences and no federal conferences or special conferences.
    In recent years I have found myself steadily falling into a similar situation. My mother has become increasingly frail, with the result that I have to spend more and more time helping her over at her house. I now found it hard to be away from Leicestershire for more than a couple of days.

    The result of this is that is a while since I have attended Lib Dem Conference and it is unlikely to get any easier for me to do so in the future.

    There must be many members in this position and many more who cannot attend Conference for other personal reasons.

    Yet this is a perspective that we have rarely heard in the debate over one member one vote (OMOV) in the party.

    That debate has largely involved young members who have the time and funds to attend conference but lacked the contacts in the party to get themselves elected by their constituency as a representative under the old rules.

    They have won their case, but if OMOV is to be a reality then the party will have to reach out to people beyond this group.

    The only thing I can see helping me participate at present is some form of online voting. But will the pressure for that be kept up now the people who were pushing for OMOV have had their own grievances met?

    Anyway, enjoy York. I wish I could be with you.
    Share:

    Paul Keetch launches Liberal Leave



    The former Liberal Democrat MP Paul Keetch announced in an article on the Independent website this afternoon that he will be voting for Britain to leave the European Union in June's referendum.

    Keetch, who sat for Hereford between 1997 and 2010, also announced that he has joined with other party members and supporters to set up the Liberal Leave campaign group.

    He makes some valid points in the article:
    Why should African countries be forced to pay 30 – 60 per cent import tariffs if they want to sell cocoa products to British chocolate factories? Are they not entitled, especially given Europe’s terrible legacy of colonialism, to a fair deal and an equal footing? 
    Thousands of refugees are fleeing the Middle East and North Africa yet the ‘free movement of peoples’ inside the European Union has in effect become a closed door to the rest of the world.
    The trouble is that a vote to leave the EU would strengthen the hand of politicians who oppose the policies Keetch favours.

    Few of his new allies in the Out movement will agree with him about Britain's colonial or want to see more immigrants from beyond Europe. Nor is public opinion likely to move in that direction if Out triumphs.

    It is hard to agree that a fight for a more liberal Britain should start with our cutting ourselves off from our closest political and geographical allies.

    I also note Paul Keetch's comment about "those of us who fought for our membership in the 1970s". 

    Paul was born in 1961. Britain agreed an accession treaty to the European Economic Community on 22 January 1972.

    If he did any campaigning for British membership of the EEC he was in short trousers at the time - or at least in flared jeans as a precocious 13-year-old for the 1975 referendum campaign.
    Share:

    Six of the Best 579

    "Why is it that when Conference supports the leadership it’s binding and an act of disrespect to rebel, but when Conference disagrees with them its word is provisional, borderline advisory?" Graham Cowie on the Scottish Liberal Democrats' row over fracking.

    Richard Kemp proposes a radical shake up of the way Liverpool is run.

    Nick Clegg and the dogging site - a first post from Ben Rathe that went viral.

    Northern Soul presents a striking piece of local history: "In 1859 the body of a man by the name of Harry Stokes washed up in the River Irwell. Upon examination, it was discovered that twice-married Stokes was biologically female and had been successfully living the life of a Victorian man in Manchester."

    "The thrill of the aerial running shot and the suddenness of the ending mean that this, rather than The 400 Blows, is the film that leaves the viewer breathless. Even writing about it makes me shiver." Somewhere Boy has been to see Andrei Tarkovsky's first feature-length film, Ivan's Childhood.

    A Clerk of Oxford visits Ramsey Abbey in the Fens.
    Share:

    Lib Dems hold seat on Rutland County Council

    Whissendine windmill © Kate Jewell
    Good news from Rutland, where the Liberal Democrats comfortably held a seat in a council by-election in Whissendine yesterday.

    The result:

    Kevin Thomas (Lib Dems)   265
    Conservative                      109
    Ukip                                    33

    The Ukip candidate was Marietta King, who has twice been their general election candidate in Harborough.

    Her intervention took a few votes from the Conservatives, but otherwise the result was more or less unchanged from October 2014 when Sam Asplin gained the seat for the Lib Dems in another by-election. He was forced to stand down by poor health.

    Rather impressively, there was a 40 per cent turn out, with no spoilt papers.

    Martin Brookes has a photo of the victorious Lib Dem candidate.

    Incidentally, Lord Bonkers played no part in this triumph. I sent his latest diary off to Liberator last night and it seems he has been in the US state of New Rutland for the Primaries.
    Share:

    Mirror alleges Tories exceeded spending limit in 9 Lib Dem seats



    This morning's Mirror takes up the Channel 4 News investigation of alleged Conservative overspending at the last general election.

    Its report says:
    A Mirror investigation today reveals how 24 Tory MPs failed to declare thousands of pounds spent on their election campaigns in marginal seats. 
    None of the MPs we name below declared the party's controversial RoadTrip battlebuses in local budgets, with Tory HQ picking up the tab instead. 
    If the estimated £2,000 cost of the bus had been included locally, some of the MPs could have breached strict spending limits. 
    Five Tory RoadTrip battlebuses crossed the country to help handpicked candidates in the final stages of last year’s election campaign, with head office picking up the tab. 
    The total cost of this campaign has never been published, but the Mirror has found invoices indicating it was more than £2,000 a day, including pay and expenses for volunteers and promotion costs.
    It is striking that 9 of the 24 seats the Mirror has identified were held by the Liberal Democrats:
    • Wells
    • Chippenham
    • North Cornwall
    • Thornbury and Yate
    • Kingston
    • Yeovil
    • Torbay
    • Cheltenham
    • Sutton and Cheam
    There's more about this story on the Channel 4 News microsite.
    Share:

    Welcome to the new Liberal Democrat bloggers

    There was only one blog added to the LibDemBlogs aggregator in February. But that was one better than the total for January.

    Nevertheless, I shall keep this feature going. Surely a Liberal Democrat revival or a blogging revival will turn up soon?

    The new blog is written by Mark Argent.

    Talking about the Cambridge for Europe group he says:
    People talk of the "Cambridge phenomenon" - the boom in businesses, especially high-tech, in and around Cambridge. But this local success relies on a much larger international framework the European single market. 
    From Cambridge, our businesses can easily reach out far and wide because the single market was created to form one set of rules for the whole of the EU. Different sets of regulations for each country are vanishing. Hidden barriers to trade are gone. 
    But Cambridge’s innovation leaders don’t just play in this big internal market, the size of the single market itself makes it easier for Cambridge to compete with innovation competitors from Japan and the USA.
    If you have a new blog you would like to appear here next month, please add it to LibDemBlogs.
    Share:

    Income inequality was unchanged over the Coalition years

    John Rentoul eats humble pie in the Independent:
    Nick Clegg: an apology. I may have given the impression that the Liberal Democrats were a waste of space, and their crushing in the general election was a merited humiliation. Statements such as “Clegg was a fool to have gone into coalition with the Tories” and “the Lib Dems got nothing in return for ministerial posts that David Cameron didn’t want to give them” may have led the reader to believe I thought the whole business a diversion and the resumption of single-party government a welcome simplification. 
    If so, there has been a misunderstanding. I now realise, reading Clegg’s interview with The Independent’s Andrew Grice last week, that I agree with Nick. 
    For all the overheated language from the left about inequality, the record of the Coalition was surprisingly good. New figures from the Office for National Statistics last week confirmed that income inequality was unchanged in the 2010-15 period. This is something of an achievement at a time when the Government was cutting public spending, and Clegg is justified in claiming to have tried to balance the books “in the fairest possible way”.
    It's good that we are starting to read views like this, but there is a need to enter a couple of qualifications.

    First, income inequality tends to decline when the economy is doing badly and to increase when it is doing well and employers have to compete for skilled labour.

    Second, as I once blogged, the Lib Dems won't flourish in 2020 by blaming the voters for 2015.

    What these figures do show is how dishonest the Labour Party was throughout the Coalition years.

    But that dishonesty did not just harm the Liberal Democrats: it harmed Labour too.

    It encouraged a mind-set under which Labour and other left-wing activists spoke only to themselves, became increasingly outraged and steadily distanced themselves from the sort of voters they need to win over.

    The natural outcome of that process was their choice of a leader who appealed to them and few others people.

    Step forward Jeremy Corbyn.
    Share:

    Council to sell Market Harborough's Settling Rooms


    These are the Settling Rooms in Market Harborough. They stand in the car park that marks the site of the town's cattle market and were once the offices where purchases made at the market were paid for.

    The Harborough Mail reports that they are to be put up for sale by Harborough District Council.

    Its story quotes understandable concerns:
    For the Liberal Democrats, Cllr Dr Sarah Hill said she was concerned about the existing tenants at The Settling Rooms - Voluntary Action South Leicestershire (VASL) and Shopmobility. 
    "Both offer important services to the community - where will they go?" she asked.
    But there may be a deeper concern about this move.

    I was on the council when the cattle market site was redeveloped. We decided to keep the Settling Rooms as a sort of ransom strip to ensure that we could any future development of the site.

    Without them, will the council and, through it, the people of the town have enough say when a second redevelopment is proposed?
    Share: