Showing posts with label George Osborne. Show all posts
Showing posts with label George Osborne. Show all posts

Lord Bonkers' Diary: Liam Fox? My dear, I screamed!

We join the old boy as he waits from his flight back from the states.

Liam Fox? My dear, I screamed!

So here I sit in the VIP departure lounge at JFK, fighting off all attempts to put ice in my Auld Johnston. Before they call the flight to Oakham International, let me share with you my hopes for the months ahead in Britain.

First, the Conservative Party. Cameron has made that the fatal error of announcing that he will go before the next election, with the result that the his potential successors have been running wild. Let me list them…

George Osborne, whose political philosophy does not extend beyond the demand that he should have all the sweets and have them now.

Theresa May, who reminds me of a Matron I once employed at the Home for Well-Behaved Orphans. Whilst Terribly Efficient, she was unwilling to take the broad view on bedtimes and muddy knees providing the first XI won its fixtures and her charges showed promise at committee room theory and practice.

Boris Johnson, who wears a Donald Trump fright wig.

I also heard Dr Liam Fox refuse to rule himself out as a future Tory leader. My dear, I screamed!

Lord Bonkers was Liberal MP for Rutland South West, 1906-10

Earlier this week in Lord Bonkers' Diary...
  • Do you know New Rutland?
  • My old Friend Rising Star
  • The New Rutland Primaries
  • Share:

    Six of the Best 583

    Andrew Grice reminds us that David Cameron and George Osborne should not forget the Lib Dems know where the bodies are buried.

    Jeremy Corbyn is "acting as though he is the leader of a 3rd or 4th party, rather than leader of the opposition," says William Barter.

    "As Milne walked down a corridor, the six-foot colleague approached from the other direction. They smashed into each other, sending Milne flying, along with the papers he was carrying. 'Seumas was in shock,' recalls an onlooker. 'No one had ever done that to him before. He expected people to show deference to him.'" Alex Wickham profiles the Winchester-educated Stalinist who is Labour's executive director of strategy and communications.

    A reader sent me a link to Futility Closet, where Alfred Kahn's concept of the "tyranny of small decisions" is discussed.

    Hunter Oatman-Stanford takes us to Scarfolk, a strange land built on the public information films made to terrify children in the 1970s.

    "In the 1960s, trip boats from Little Venice would take extended tours across the Thames into the depths of Peckham and Camberwell, and even in the 1970s, some insisted the canal should be saved." Peter Watts on the loss of the Grand Surrey Canal.
    Share:

    Schools are being nationalised so they can be privatised

    As Stephen Tall rightly says, the announcement in the Budget that all schools will be obliged to become academies amounts to the nationalisation of education.

    And as John Elledge shows, that nationalisation includes the biggest appropriation of Church land since the Reformation.

    What is going on?

    I think I put my finger on it back in 2007 when I reviewed Reinventing the State - the social liberal riposte to the Orange Book - for the Guardian.

    I suggested that Liberal Democrat activists would:
    appreciate the way Huhne's vision of a rich diversity of local provision contrasts with the Tory idea of popular schools taking over the rest: "It's been a good half for the school: the match with Harrow was won, and St Custard's was purchased through a leveraged buy out."
    That sounds like me attributing my own eccentric enthusiasms to the party as a whole, and I have forgotten what became of the idea of popular schools taking over the rest.

    But it was clear back in 2007 that the Conservatives believes schools should be run as much like private companies as possible.

    Hence the recent emphasis on chains of academies. Hence the Budget's removal of parent governors as part of its nationalisation of schools.

    What I fear will come next is the gradual privatisation of what the Treasury has nationalised.

    As John Elledge says,
    Which schools have held out against academisation? They're disproportionately small (larger ones are more likely to be able to afford in house IT teams and so forth). They're disproportionately likely to be primaries (secondaries are larger). And they're disproportionately likely to be rated outstanding (if it ain't broke, don't fix it). 
    And what type of schools are disproportionately likely to be small but outstanding primaries? Faith schools.
    Taking on the churches my look a bridge to far even for George Osborne, but it is easy to imagine a campaign against small schools.

    We will be told that they cannot offer the facilities and breadth of curriculum that our children deserve. Expect to hear the 'global race' invoked.

    And what will become of these closed small schools? Just think of the prime building land they occupy in the centre of sought-after villages.

    The forced application of a business ethos to education will result in narrowed educational provision and a diminished life in many communities, even if the schools stay in the public sector.

    But is hard to resist the prediction that, at some point in the process, the Treasury will take the opportunity of cashing in and selling off schools to the private sector.
    Share:

    The first time I saw George Osborne



    In the days when I wrote a weekly column for Liberal Democrat News - in the days when there was a Liberal Democrat News - I had a Press Gallery pass at the Palace of Westminster.

    Everyone said the place resembled nothing so much as a public school. Not having attended such an establishment myself, I was not really qualified to judge.

    But the it certainly resembled what I imagined a public school to be like, albeit largely without the roasting over fires or flagellation.

    One day in 2001 I saw an improbably  youthful figure on the opposition front bench. He really did look like a cheeky fourth-former sitting in the prefects' seats. I expected him to be booted out as soon as they turned up.

    I asked a Press Gallery attendant (they know everyone by sight) who he was.

    "That's George Osborne,"he explained.
    Share:

    Sell George Osborne

    If George Osborne ever hits a target, it will look something like this...



    Thanks to Jeremy Corbyn and the rabble around him, George Osborne must think himself invulnerable. Hence his trip to California at the expense of Google to watch the Super Bowl.

    But it is noticeable that in recent weeks more articles critical of the Chancellor have been appearing in Conservative newspapers.

    At the end of January there was a vicious piece in the Sun:
    George Osborne’s hopes of becoming PM have been severely dented by the Google tax shambles, Tories claim - as a senior minister branded him a "social cripple like Gordon Brown". 
    Top Conservatives are increasingly worried the Chancellor does not have what it takes to succeed David Cameron, with another minister saying voters see him as "weird" like Ed Miliband.
    And this morning Peter Oborne wrote in the Mail:
    Mr Osborne has always been a part-time Chancellor. He is often not at the Treasury, because he is, in effect, the Government’s chief strategist and party manager as well as being Chancellor. It’s he who decides on promotions and sackings. 
    He has taken charge of negotiations with the European Union and will manage the campaign to keep Britain in Europe once the referendum is called. 
    In addition, he is running his personal campaign to succeed David Cameron as Tory leader, and is particularly assiduous in wining and dining Tory MPs in order to get their support. 
    Let’s try a mental experiment. Let’s imagine that Britain was a public company and the finance director also ran human relations, marketing, PR and strategy — all the while intriguing to take over as chief executive. 
    There would be an almighty row. Shareholders wouldn’t allow it. They would insist the finance director focused to the exclusion of all else on making certain that the accounts were properly maintained.
    Maybe this has something to do with his colleagues' growing awareness that David Cameron will not be Conservative leader for ever.

    If so, George Osborne is still the bookies' favourite. But I would suggest you sell George Osborne.
    Share:

    Lord Lucan, John Aspinall and George Osborne



    A new theory about what happened Lord Lucan after he murdered Sandra Rivett in 1974 emerged this week.

    According to the Daily Mail, he shot himself and was then fed to a tiger at John Aspinall's zoo in Kent.

    I don't believe a word of it, but the Lucan story has always fascinated me.

    The best picture of John Aspinall is to be found in John Pearson's The Gamblers, but a few quotes will suffice.

    Here is the Daily Express from 2013:
    "Aspinall was a total crook," says Sir Rupert [Mackeson] now. "He started in the days when gambling was illegal away from racecourses. His mother Lady Osborne was a real force behind the operation." 
    Aspinall and his mother were charged with "keeping a common gaming house" but were acquitted on a technicality in 1958. ... 
    Aspinall opened the Clermont in 1962 after gambling had been legalised and its founder members included five dukes, five marquesses and nearly 20 earls. 
    Aspinall was determined to relieve the bluebloods of their money and use the funds to finance his private zoo where he bred tigers. 
    "He employed crooked dealers and used a wide range of techniques for cheating," says Sir Rupert. "He encouraged rich people, young aristocrats and in particular rich divorcees, to come to his club. A lot of people were ruined. Lucan lost a fortune and so became a house player for Aspinall."
    Some of the money Aspinall fleeced from the aristocracy went to fund his zoos and wildlife breeding projects. But lest you feel too warm to him about that, read this anonymous blog post:
    Both Howletts and Port Lympne seemed to attract human disaster. Aspinall's daughter-in-law, Louise, was bitten by a tiger cub and needed 15 stitches. A boy of 10 had his arm ripped off by a chimpanzee at Port Lympne, and was awarded £132,000 in damages. Bindu, an English bull elephant, crushed a "bonding" keeper to death at Howletts and later Darren Cockrill, who was crushed by an elephant at Port Lympne in February 2001. 
    In 1994, the local council banned the keepers from entering the tiger cages after one of their number, Trevor Smith, was killed at Howletts.
    My reason for writing about Aspinall, beyond the Lucan and tiger story, is his mother. Because Lady Osborne is also the grandmother of George Osborne.

    Her first husband was Dr Robert Aspinall and John was the child of that marriage (though John is said to have discovered in later life that he was not Robert's son and to have found and supported his real father).

    Her second was Sir George Osborne. They had four children together, and George Osborne is the son of the third of them.

    He was famously christened Gideon, but changed his name to George, in honour of his grandfather who was dead by then, at the age of 13.

    So that is my Trivial Fact of the Day.

    It also explains why you can find headlines like:

    Lord Lucan 'told George Osborne's grandmother he was planning to kill his WIFE days before he murdered his nanny and then drowned himself days later'
    Share:

    Mike Storey to visit Church Stretton and Bishop's Castle

    A good write up for the Liberal Democrat peer in the Shropshire Star:
    Lord Mike Storey is the Lib Dem spokesman on education in the House of Lords and will be visiting two south Shropshire towns whose leisure centres both receive funding via schools, and face a shortfall of tens of thousands of pounds due to cuts. 
    Lord Storey, who was a headteacher and also leader of Liverpool City Council, is expected to visit Church Stretton on January 22, where the future of the town’s swimming pool is being reviewed. 
    He will then visit Norbury Primary School, near Bishop’s Castle area, and the SpArC Centre in Bishop’s Castle, which is also threatened by cuts.
    The report also quotes Charlotte Barnes, the Liberal Democrat councillor for Bishop's Castle:
    "Our leisure centres contribute to the well-being of our residents, they help to keep people healthy and happy. 
    "They must save the care budgets a fortune and of course they are one of the few places to offer young people activities in our more isolated areas."
    The scale of the cuts being inflicted on council spending represents an area of vulnerability for the Tories. David Cameron, for one, has not grasped what George Osborne is doing to local services.

    I hope the Lib Dems will take up this issue in the way that Mike Storey and Charlotte Barnes are in Shropshire. Such a campaign will mean more to our traditional voters than a call for further tax cuts.
    Share: