06/14 Links Pt2: Zionism didn't cause the Farhud, Israel didn't cause Sarona; NYTs Launches a Shavuot Attack on Israel

From Ian:

Ben-Dror Yemini: Zionism didn't cause the Farhud, Israel didn't cause Sarona
75 years later on, the motives behind the pogroms on Baghdad's Jews are the same as the Sarona Market and Orlando attacks: murderous hatred; Huldai is presumptuous and erroneous to justify terrorism.
It happens again and again. Last week at Sarona Market, Saturday in Orlando, and exactly 75 years ago, June 1941, during the Shavuot holiday, in Baghdad, Iraq, when a mob set out on a pogrom against the Jews. Some 180 Jews were murdered in the "Farhud," the Iraqi version of Kristallnacht. That isn't a mistake. It was a night of bloodshed preceded by Nazi propaganda directed by the German ambassador in Baghdad, Dr. Fritz Grobba.
Iraq was in those days an independent country. Grobba's influence on the local elite was large. Inter alia, he sent delegations to Berlin, bought a newspaper and took pains to publish therein Hitler's Mein Kampf in installments. The hatred of Jews was not because of Zionism. The majority of Iraq's Jews were not then Zionists. They were, precisely like the Jews of Germany, part of the backbone of the economy, development and progress. During those years, Grobba ensured a steady and virulent drip of anti-Semitic Nazi propaganda. The drip worked: The government took a series of steps against Jews, and their situation worsened.
Later, after having successfully spread the al-Aqsa plot hoax throughout Palestine and after getting into trouble with the British Mandate authorities, the Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin al-Husseini, came to Baghdad and added fuel to the fire. Two months before the Farhud, a pro-Nazi coup took place in Iraq, headed by Rashid Ali al-Gaylani. The Second World War was at its height, and the British were advancing on Baghdad. Al-Gaylani and the mufti, the largest inciters, fled to Berlin, where they were received as heroes. The two left the massacre of the Jews of Baghdad to the incited local crowd.
Jennifer Rubin: Israel makes do without a steady U.S. ally
The situation is far from ideal. The U.S.-Israel relationship, rooted in common values and interests as well as mutual foes, has been beneficial to both sides. Autocratic regimes that have no particular attachment to the idea of a Jewish state are not the most reliable of allies, and the degree of cooperation Israel can expect from them in the intelligence realm, for example, is limited.
Ironically, as Kramer points out, the “status quo is unsustainable” narrative that Western diplomats repeat ad nauseam to justify fruitless attempts to secure an Israeli-Palestinian solution does not take into account just how sustainable the status quo has been and may continue to be with Israel’s multifaceted alliances. (“Israel is well positioned to sustain the status quo all by itself. Its long-term strategy is predicated on it.”)
One should not, however, make the mistake of concluding that the U.S.-Israel relationship has been irrevocably changed. One president does not remake decades of policy, especially given the bipartisan support for Israel in Congress and among American voters. Moreover, whether the U.S.-Israel relationship is permanently transformed will depend on the next president. Kramer writes that Hillary Clinton has added a caveat to the “status quo is unsustainable” line. He quotes her as saying “Now, that doesn’t mean that it can’t be sustained for a year or a decade, or two or three …”
In short, President Obama’s departure may repair much of the damage done by his effort to put “daylight” between the United States and Israel and his desire to retreat from the region, provided that the next president returns to the bipartisan policy in place before Obama. If, as an added bonus, Israel can also maintain and bolster its new relationships despite an unresolved Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the latter will seem more sustainable than ever before. At the very least, it will convey that Palestinians’ dream of eliminating or wearing down the Jewish state is a fantasy — one not shared by the United States, China, Russia or even Israel’s Arab neighbors. (h/t Alexi)
UK aid 'indirectly spent on Palestinian terror groups' former Cabinet minister warns
UK aid money is indirectly funding Palestinian terrorism, a former Cabinet Minister has warned.
Sir Eric Pickles claimed financial assistance sent to Palestine by the British Government is being used to free up money to pay prisoners who have committed crimes in the conflict with Israel.
The former communities secretary also warned there are "worrying reports" that some NGOs supported by UK taxpayer's money are "promoting violence on social media pages" and called on Ministers to investigate urgently.
International Development Minister Desmond Swayne denied the claims, insisting money given to the Palestinian Authority funds specific civil servants and cannot be misused.
ODI Statement: Daily Telegraph article on links between terrorism and UK Aid to the Palestinian Authority citing ODI research ‘factually inaccurate



The New York Times Launches a Shavuot Attack on Israel
The New York Times marked the holiday of Shavuot — a holiday that celebrates the covenant between God and the Jewish people, a covenant in which the Jews get a land in return for following the law — by publishing an attack on the Jewish state.
The attack came in the form of an op-ed piece by one Daniel Sieradski. Perhaps the Times chose to publish it on a Jewish holiday to prevent observant Jews from challenging it in real-time. Kind of an opinion journalism version of the Yom Kippur War.
But the Times article would be nonsense no matter when it was published.
The article is headlined “Andrew Cuomo’s Anti-Free Speech Move on B.D.S.” It makes the argument that somehow it violates the First Amendment if the state of New York decides not to do business with those promoting an economic boycott of Israel.
It’s a foolish argument on several grounds. First, the Times editorial page and the political left of which Mr. Sieradski is a part have been campaigning tirelessly for the reversal of the Supreme Court decision in Citizens United. In that case, the Supreme Court overruled a law that would have prevented the mass distribution of books or movies critical of a political candidate in the six months prior to an election.
In other words, the New York Times doesn’t give a fig about the First Amendment when it comes to Congress actually banning political campaign speech here in America. In fact, the paper is actively hostile to the First Amendment when it comes to campaign speech by the non-Sulzberger rich. But when Governor Cuomo moves to protect Israel, then, all of a sudden, the paper starts to voice sentiments of First Amendment absolutism.
Don’t be fooled by what the Times pretends. This has nothing to do with the First Amendment. It has to do with Israel.
Holy war: 1948 call for holy war against the nascent Jewish state
Nothing quite like looking at original documents to get to the heat of the matter.
From the May 15, 1948 Los Angeles Times, issued on the day of Israel's independence.
The war against Israel was not a territorial dispute- it was jihad- a holy war.
Sheik Mamoun Al Shinawi, rector of the 1000 year old Alazhar University and spiritual leader of Moslems throughout the world called today for a jihad (holy war) against the Jews of the new state of Israel.
"The decisive hour has come," Shiek Shinawi said in a radio address.
"Come to war and struggle for the sake of Allah"
"Today is your day," the rector told Moslems. "The whole world is watching you. Unless you rise to defend your rights,unless you fight your enemy and are ready to die for Allah and your countries, humiliation will be your lot"
There is no mention of the "Palestinian" people in this article, or in any newspaper article written in 1948.
The Shapes of Casual Western Anti-Zionism
Those that criticise Israel particularly harshly over the Jewish State’s handling of the conflict, often argue that ‘Jews should know better’ or words to the same effect. This stance appeals to a protracted history of persecution and genocide in Europe, which reached a peak with the Holocaust.
This seemingly reflexive bias can find expression in some unexpected places. Godfrey Graham, a seasoned cameraman who worked in current-affairs programming at RTE, since the early period of the Broadcaster’s transmission service, described several filming engagements in Israel for his memoir ‘Forty Years Behind the Lens at RTE’, published by Ashfield Press (Dublin).
This relatively detailed article focuses on a number of paragraphs in Graham’s memoir — a book that was clearly not intended to be an exposition of the conflict. There does not appear to be a substantive animus held by the author toward Israel, for he describes his general experiences in quite positive terms. Yet the relevant paragraphs present a clear narrative, which forcefully asserts that the Jewish people of Israel are morally blameworthy, while the Arabs of the region are not. Thus, it represents a good example of the commonplace casually anti-Zionist views often expressed in the West today.
What Israeli-Jews ought to do
Of a visit to Israel in the early 1980s, Graham described (pages 142–144) a pleasant meeting with Chaim Herzog (President of Israel between 1983 and 1993), who was born in Belfast and had strong links with Dublin which were discussed in a convivial atmosphere. However, Graham’s tone darkened when it came to the matter of the conflict:
Ryan Bellerose: Telling The Story
How we talk about Israel matters.
The biggest reason we are losing the war of perception is that we aren’t fighting it.
Our sides best known advocates are dry, boring lecturers who say the same things over and over, who really on stats and facts, and who are not really very engaging to anyone who has not already “drunk the koolaid” so to speak. I know because I watch the difference between what I as an engaged pro-Israel person sees and feels and what some of my friends that I drag with me see and feel.
I first got a great view of this when I sent a video that I genuinely enjoyed of Dershowitz telling off an Arab woman who literally said she was for the idea of genocide against the Jews. A buddy yawned and said “Yeah she hates Jews, BOOORING”. A few days later I sent a video made by my buddy Joni Versity that mocked some Arab women who had made a video “refuting” a video made by an Israeli politician. Not only did he laugh, but he actually watched a much longer video and even references it sometimes now.
The Joni Video is here [NSFW]

You see pro-Israel advocates often talk like mothers, they never swear, they sound proud at awkward times and embarrassed at others, they are overly verbose and concentrate on minutiae and details that don’t matter to anyone but them or people like them. They are not engaging even if they are clearly invested in the subject.
Clinton: Saudi, Kuwait, Qatar must stop citizens from funding extremists
White House hopeful Hillary Clinton on Monday issued a pointed warning to US allies in the Middle East, saying countries like Saudi Arabia must crack down on citizens supporting extremism.
Following the weekend massacre at a gay club in Orlando by a gunman who the FBI says may have been radicalized, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee vowed to step up efforts to stop so-called lone wolf attacks, and said Americans should unite to defeat domestic terrorism.
But she also called on other governments to reconsider policies that allow extremism to thrive, calling out three US allies which already have sensitive ties with Washington.
“It is long past time for the Saudis, the Qataris, and the Kuwaitis and others to stop their citizens from funding extremist organizations,” Clinton said in a national security speech in Cleveland, Ohio.
“And they should stop supporting radical schools and mosques around the world that have set too many young people on a path toward extremism.”
Duckworth Skips Vote to Help Holocaust Victims for J Street Fundraiser
Rep. Tammy Duckworth (D., Ill.) skipped a congressional vote to help Holocaust victims on Tuesday so that she could fundraise with the liberal Middle East lobbying group J Street, which has a reputation for promoting an anti-Israel agenda.
Duckworth ditched a Tuesday evening vote on legislation that would ensure “all Holocaust victims live with dignity, comfort, and security in their remaining years,” according to the official vote tally, which showed the lawmaker was one of 70 members to not vote on the measure.
The measure also encouraged Germany to reaffirm its commitment to providing the remaining survivors, many of who live below the poverty line, with financial aid and healthcare resources.
Duckworth, who is locked in a battle to unseat Republican Sen. Mark Kirk, appears to have missed the vote to attend a 6:00 p.m. fundraiser organized by J Street, which is backing the Duckworth’s Senate bid.
The fundraiser encouraged supporters to donate anywhere from $250 to $2,700 to Duckworth, according to promotional materials circulated by J Street.
Duckworth’s absence drew criticism from Kirk’s campaign, which told the Washington Free Beacon that this is becoming a pattern for the Democratic candidate.
PreOccupiedTerritory: Study: Some Of Sanders Best Friends Jewish (satire)
Researchers from the Brookings Institute, a think tank, documented and identified the one hundred closest friends in the life of Bernie Sanders. To do so, they relied on video footage, documents disclosed to the public, leaked phone records, and other sources of information to triangulate which of the many people surrounding the candidate can reliably be deemed his friends. The records and documentation covered the last eighteen months, such that the researchers are confident the data provide an accurate picture of the Vermont senator’s friends.
“We made rough ranking of the senator’s non-campaign and non-government contacts with whom he maintains a connection and makes attempts to visit or otherwise spend time with outside the scope of his official or campaign duties,” said lead researchers Asa Joo. “We did so by cataloging the amount of time Mr. Sanders spends with such individuals, either in person or via the internet, and established a case for each of those people being called his friend. What we discovered was that of the top twenty people ranked for friendship in the life of Bernie Sanders, four are Jewish, with one of the four even attending a synagogue on the High Holidays every few years.”
Other researchers offered cautious praise for the findings. “This should be useful,” said Donald Drumpf, a New York businessman with a keen interest in demographic studies. “Not exactly huge, but still pretty good. I’d like to see more information on other backgrounds, such as Mexicans and Muslims. I think these studies are actually hiding something. I’m going to have some of the best people review the information. I’ll bet they won’t believe what they’ll be finding.”
Sanders declined to be interviewed for this article, citing a scheduling conflict that had him at an all-day strategy session with the Council on American-Islamic Relations.
Labour's Antisemitism Problem
Here’s a fresh conspiracy theory, for those who need such things: what if Livingstone started the whole mishagas on purpose to galvanise the anti-Semitic extremists into voting — and voting his way? Some sacrifice. He gets to potter around his newt pond for nine months until Corbyn quietly brings him back into the arena.
The fact is that nobody cares about the Jewish vote. We are 240,000 people in Britain. The more anti-Semitic Labour’s private agenda is, the more votes they get from those millions who are programmed to hate and fear us. Corbyn and Sadiq Khan and Livingstone have embraced and entertained those who incite the murder of Jews and the destruction of the Jewish state. Corbyn knew the provocateurs, extremists and infiltrators in his party but prevaricated in warning themto stop their racist behaviour and in denying them platforms.
Meanwhile, on Sunday morning TV, the most hate-filled studio “discussion” took place between Israel bashers and defenders, hand-picked, it would seem, by Katie Hopkins. Lunatic, petrifying, anti-Semites — the worst being self-hating Jews who prefaced each remark with “I’m Jewish myself, but . . .”. Shame on the researchers. It made me feel sick all day.
The Palestinian cause is as important a cause as the occupation of Tibet, Chechnya, Crimea, Kurdistan, Northern Cyprus. I won’t go on because they will accuse me, as they always do, of “what-about-ism” and never, never give me an answer as to why they don’t give a flying fart about the “right to return” of any of these other oppressed peoples. So, as I said, I did not respond. I am too tired. I am 4,000 years too tired.
Exclusive: Second largest German bank shuts anti-Israel BDS account
The international banking giant Commerzbank closed a boycott Israel account in Germany, The Jerusalem Post has learned. A highly reliable source told the Post that the account has been “dealt with” and the bank notified the account holder over a month ago.
The closure of the anti-Israel account because of Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) activity targeting Israel is believed to be the first instance of a German-owned bank taking action against BDS.
"I welcome and commend the decision by Commerzbank and other European banks to close the accounts of BDS organizations. This is the right thing to do from both a legal, financial and moral perspective. The BDS campaign, which seeks the destruction of Israel, is discriminatory, anti-Semitic and anti-peace, and often has connections to extremist and terrorist groups,” Gilad Erdan, the public security minister, told the Post on Tuesday.
Erdan, who is tasked with combating BDS for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s administration, added “I call on other banks to follow Commerzbank's example, particularly those with connections to official state bodies which claim to oppose BDS. I will continue to work to expose the true face of the BDS extremists and their supporters, and to ensure that they face the full consequences of their actions."
The anti-Israel and pro-BDS website “Der Semit” lists its account in a small town in the state of Hesse, where Commerzbank’s headquarters are located in Frankfurt. BDS seeks to pressure Israel to make concessions to the Palestnians. (h/t Yenta Press)
IsraellyCool: Indians Reject Israel Boycott Calls, Point Out Hypocrisy
But just as you start thinking this place must be the pits, along comes a glimmer of hope.
Meanwhile, buyers of dates from Karachi Bakery are unperturbed by the boycott call. “Dates are made by Allah and grow on trees. It doesn’t matter which country they are grown in. This is a mischief by a handful of politicians, who want to get political mileage during this time. Next time, they may ask to boycott Irani dates alleging that they are grown by Shias,” said Md Sajid of Afzalgunj, a regular buyer of dates from Karachi Bakery.
“If they want to boycott Israel, why don’t they boycott all their products, including medicines and the ventilators in hospitals? Many medicines manufactured by Israel are used by Hyderabadi Muslims. Where does hatred go then? Is it selective as per our comfort? Islam doesn’t preach hatred sahab,” said Yusuf Ismail, a resident of Fateh Darwaza of Old City.

Ah yes, the sweet smell of common sense.
Someone wants to suppress this video of vile BDS shoutdown of Professor
I responded to YouTube as follows:
Regarding the notice of privacy complaint below, the complaint is without any justification. The person in the video engaged in conduct at a public event, and his actions have received widespread public attention. The person in the video also is a political activist to calls attention to himself and has received substantial news coverage for his actions. See, e.g., this Google search, https://www.google.com/#q=Joseph+Loughnane
This video is proper reporting and in the public interest. To take it down over a privacy concern does not comply with YouTube’s own Privacy Guidelines, which state “We also take public interest, newsworthiness, and consent into account when determining if content should be removed for a privacy violation.” This video is of a news event that took place in public, there is no expectation of privacy for such public conduct.
Moreover, the person in the video is not even identified by name in the video and no private information about him is contained in the video.
The attempt to cause the take down of this video is an attempt to suppress legitimate journalism and news reporting. YouTube should not become a party to that. Please deny the privacy complaint, and inform me of that outcome.
Thanks,
William Jacobson

I don’t know how YouTube will rule. If the video is taken down from YouTube, it will be a blow to the public’s right to know about the true face of the BDS movement.
The video will not disappear completely, as I have uploaded it to out own server, but in any event, I have also uploaded the video to our own server, but given the huge viewer base of YouTube, damage will have been done.
Widespread Fraud in Jewish Voice for Peace's Airbnb petition
The Stolen Homes Coalition which includes Code Pink, American Muslims for Palestine, the US Palestinian Community Network, US Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation and Jewish Voice for Peace has launched a campaign against Airbnb and Fidelity investments to pressure them to exclude vacation rentals in Judea and Samaria. A June 3 “day of action” included protests at Fidelity offices in San Francisco, Los Angeles, Washington, D.C., and several other cities qnd culminated in the dramatic presentation of a petition allegedly signed by over 150,000 people.
Allegedly.
Activists on Social media have exposed widespread fraud in the petition drive. Turns out the JVP and friends claims were a bit exaggerated.
A petition hosted at Sum of us has no precautions in place to prevent multiple entries per IP. There is no verification mechanism in place, and no restrictions on the number of times a single computer can "sign".
Its no wonder the petition has over 150,000 "names" listed .
Word to the wise: Take any JVP sponsored "petition" with a grain of salt.
The Gaza electricity stories the BBC reports – and the ones it doesn’t
Since the end of the summer 2014 conflict between Israel and terrorist groups in the Gaza Strip, that same power plant has again stopped functioning on several occasions. Those stories had nothing to do with Israel and were not reported by the BBC.
BBC silent on latest Gaza power plant shut down
No BBC reporting on latest power crisis in the Gaza Strip
BBC News passes up the chance to set the record straight on Gaza shortages
One result of the ongoing dispute between Hamas and the Palestinian Authority which has brought about regular power shortages and stoppages is the failure to treat sewage and the consequent flow of untreated waste into the sea.
Israel recently announced that it will increase the supply of electricity it provides to the Gaza Strip in order to enable the recently completed sewage treatment plant there to operate effectively.
To date BBC audiences have not seen any coverage of this particular Gaza Strip electricity story.
AFP/Getty Images Blames Israel For Surviving 1967 War
In a jaw-dropping example of total ignorance of basic history, AFP/Getty, one of the world’s largest news photo banks, published the following photo caption which was picked up by newspapers around the world:
An Israeli soldier prays Sunday at the Western Wall in the Old City during Jerusalem Day, which marks Israel’s 1967 seizure of the Palestinian-dominated eastern half of the city. Israel occupied east Jerusalem in the Six-Day War and latter annexed it in a move never recognized by the international community.
Here’s what AFP/Getty hid from news audiences:
1. The Six Day War was a defensive war in which Israel fought for survival against multiple armies who had declared their intent to “wipe Israel off the map.”
2. Jews were living in eastern Jerusalem long before 1967, until Jordan invaded and occupied in 1948. Jordan’s occupation included the historic “Jewish Quarter” and Jewish holy sites such as the Western Wall.
3. Jordan ignored Israeli pleas to stay out of the war, and instead used its occupation of eastern Jerusalem as a base from which to pound Israel with rockets and ground forces. Had Jordan not forced Israel to defend its very existence, Jordan would very likely still be in control of eastern Jerusalem today.
UK Media Watch prompts correction to Daily Mail “apartheid wall” caption
On June 7th, we posted on the following photo caption from a June 6th Daily Mail article about the ‘radical’ British graffiti artist known as Bansky:
We complained to Daily Mail editors, arguing that characterizing Israel’s security fence – erected in response to Palestinian suicide bombings during the Second Intifada – as an “apartheid wall” is an egregious distortion of the truth, and parrots the incendiary rhetoric of extremist anti-Israel activists.
Daily Mail editors replied to our complaint that same day, and agreed to correct the caption. The word “apartheid” was removed from the caption.
Fox Sports reporter fired after slurring Jews, Mexicans
A Fox Sports sideline reporter has been fired for making racist and anti-Semitic comments on a live Facebook broadcast.
In the broadcast Thursday on Barstool Sports’ Facebook Live, Emily Austen, 27, said Jewish people are stingy and expressed surprise that a Mexican immigrant was a high school valedictorian because, “I didn’t even know Mexicans were that smart.” She also made a stereotypical remark about Chinese Americans.
Citing an unnamed source with the Tampa Bay Rays, who Austen covers, Business Insider reported Friday that Austen had been fired for the comments and will not appear on any future game broadcasts.
In a statement first published on Deadspin, Fox Sports Florida senior vice president Steve Tello said: “We were made aware that Emily Austen appeared in a social media video unaffiliated with FOX Sports in which she made insensitive and derogatory comments. She was not speaking on behalf of FOX Sports, nor do we condone any of the statements she made in the video. Emily has been advised that her comments were unacceptable, and she is not scheduled to appear on any upcoming FOX Sports Florida or FOX Sports Sun broadcasts.
Belfast memorial to ‘godfather of Israeli army’ vandalized
In what is being treated as a hate crime, a Belfast mural honoring a local Christian citizen who led a historic Jewish legion in World War I and then advocated for the creation of the State of Israel was vandalized.
The memorial to Lt. Col. John Henry Patterson was damaged early Thursday morning after two containers were set ablaze nearby, the Irish News reported. Belfast is in northern Ireland, which is part of the United Kingdom.
An officer in the British army, Patterson during World War I commanded the Zion Mule Corps, the first Jewish fighting force in nearly two millennia, which fought in the Gallipoli Campaign. He went on to become an ardent supporter of the creation of a Jewish state.
His remains were moved to Israel last year and buried alongside the Jewish soldiers, belatedly fulfilling a wish he had expressed before his death in 1947, one year before the establishment of the State of Israel. At the 2015 burial ceremony in Israel, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Patterson “can be called the godfather of the Israeli army.”
Hungary: One-third of population shares the most widespread anti-Semitic beliefs to some degree

The survey by Median Opinion and Market Research Institute was commissioned by Action and Protection Foundation (TEV). It shows that the level of anti-Semitism has grown somewhat over the last year and that prejudices against Jews are closely related to xenophobia in general.
Median researchers gathered information on opinions and beliefs related to Jews, the frequency and strength of anti-Semitic prejudice,and perceptions of anti-Semitism and associations related to Jews.
Founded in 2013, Action and Protection Foundation (TEV) is a body monitoring anti-Semitism in Hungary and chaired by Daniel Bodnar, a member of the executive board of the Chabad-affiliated Unified Hungarian Jewish Congregation.
“It is the mission of TEV to survey the state of anti-Semitic prejudices in Hungary year after year. Our purpose is to get a clear picture of this phenomenon through fully objective research, and not think about it based on subjective impressions,'' said Bodnar.
Around 100,000 Jews live in Hungary.
Replica of Nazi Gas Chamber on Display at Architecture Exhibit in Venice
A team of architectural historians created a replica of a Nazi gas chamber that is now on display at the 15th International Venice Architectural Biennale, Wired.com reported.
The reconstruction, called “The Evidence Room,” comes with a full-scale gas column, door and a gas-tight hatch. Robert Jan van Pelt, an architectural historian at Canada’s University of Waterloo, along with other professors and students from the university, built the exhibit to work with the Biennale’s theme of “Reporting from the Front.”
“It is a profound experience for all of us,” said van Pelt in a statement, “and, in design terms, a radical, unprecedented investigation into the possibility to represent something unrepresentable: the architectural evidence of a factory of death.”
The design for “The Evidence Room” was taken from actual evidence Van Pelt presented in court when he was called to defend writer and historian Deborah Lipstadt, after Holocaust denier David Irving sued her for libel in 1996.
Austrian minister: Hitler birth house may be demolished
Austria’s interior minister says he can imagine having the house where Adolf Hitler was born demolished, calling it “the cleanest solution.”
The Austrian government wants to expropriate the house in Braunau am Inn on the German border where the future Nazi leader was born in 1889 to ensure that it doesn’t become a place of pilgrimage for neo-Nazis.
The Interior Ministry has rented the house since 1972 to prevent its misuse, subletting it to various charitable organizations. The building has stood empty since a care center for adults with disabilities moved out in 2011.
Interior Minister Wolfgang Sobotka told ORF television late Saturday that the expropriation is “necessary.” He said that “we have tried to clear up all possibilities for using it and buying it with the owner, but with no results.”
“For me, a demolition … would be the cleanest solution,” Sobotka said.
Elbit tunes in to Europe and unveils next-gen defense products
As Europe contends with its huge influx of refugees and terror incidents, Elbit Systems Ltd., Israel’s largest non-government owned defense company, is tuning in and proposing new technologies that have the potential to meet the growing and changing security needs of the continent.
“After many years of hibernation, there is reawakening” of defense spending in Europe, Ran Kril, executive VP of international marketing and business development at Elbit, said at a press conference in Netanya, Israel, ahead of the Eurosatory defense and security exhibition in Paris next week.
“The security needs of Europe are growing” as the continent contends with issues such as an refugees, terror, and Russia and Ukraine, Kril said. “All these are leading to renewed defense spending. Elbit’s portfolio of products knows how to meet these needs.”
Defense spending in Europe is forecast to rise in 2016 for the first time in years, NATO secretary-general Jens Stoltenberg said in an interview with the Financial Times in May. In 2015, NATO’s European partners spent $253 billion on defense, equivalent to 1.43 percent of gross domestic product and well below the 2 percent guideline set by NATO.
Israeli firm creates tiny, terrifying pistol-packing robot
The tiny robot looks like your average autonomous vacuum cleaner — just another little black box rolling on the floor, until you realize: this Roomba-like creature is packing heat.
An Israeli company has created a small remote-controlled robot designed for law enforcement and military use that is capable of firing a pistol, specifically for use in hostage rescue and counterterrorism operations.
The Dogo, as the 26.5 pound (12 kilogram) robot is known, was created by the Israeli corporation General Robotics Ltd. and will be formally debuted at the Eurosatory defense exhibition in Paris later this month, the company announced in a statement.
The gun-toting bot is named after a vicious dog breed, the Dogo Argentino or Argentine Mastiff, a large white hunting dog. However, unlike the canine Dogo, which stands at over two feet (60 centimeters) tall, the robotic Dogo is just 5.5 inches (14 centimeters) tall while in “stealth mode” and 11 inches (28 centimeters) tall when fully deployed, according to the company.
Singaporean-Israeli image recognition startup Trax grabs $40 million investment
Trax announced on Wednesday that it scored a $40 million Series C funding round, bringing their total financing raised to date to $78 million. They did not disclose the names of investors, but a spokesman told Geektime that it includes many private investors and Broad Peak Investment Advisers, a hedge fund originally backed by Temasek upon its founding.
What makes Trax legitimately groundbreaking is that it uses image recognition to give back data feeds quickly on brands and recommendations for promotion. You use the Trax app to take photos of a given manufacturer or retailer’s product on a store shelf. The app then spits back sales data and recommends how to improve sales even by changing the placement of products relative to its environment in the store.
“We are incredibly excited to expand our footprint in North America, particularly with retailers in the United States. We have found the market extremely enthusiastic and eager to leverage our advanced machine learning technology and retail data science solutions,” said Co-Founder and Trax CCO Dror Feldheim in a press release. “Retailers turn our data and insights into broader market intelligence and highly accurate trend predictions that shine a light on new ways to improve their customer experiences in-store.”
The product is mainly for supermarkets, with special settings for shelves and coolers/refrigerators. But it pools selling data from a number of sources. Its so-called “real-time shelf analysis” is justifiably labeled a “corrective actions” tool. If your product is too low on the shelf or blends too much with the color scheme of another (an example I just made up), it’s worth moving it.
IsraellyCool: Delicious! Simply Red’s Mick Hucknall Slams BDS In Most Awesome Way
Simply Red are playing in Israel tonight – a clear loss for BDS.
But it gets better – way better.
Lead singer Mick Hucknall is slamming the BDS-holes on social media!
Ooh look! BDS Activists to Carlos Santana: Don’t Play in Israel
— Mick Hucknall (@mjhucknall) June 13, 2016
Phew! And yes, my maternal Grandmother was Jewish.. Goodnight all and shalom!
— Mick Hucknall (@mjhucknall) June 13, 2016
I see Madonna also recieved abuse from the self righteous
— Mick Hucknall (@mjhucknall) June 14, 2016

Mick, you truly rock!
P.S If your maternal grandmother was Jewish, that makes you Jewish. Glad to have you in the tribe!
Don't stop them now: Queen and Adam Lambert will rock Tel Aviv
Classic British rock band Queen will bring a “killer” show full of well-known and beloved hits to Tel Aviv’s Park Hayarkon on September 12, with American Idol alumnus Adam Lambert as lead singer. The concert will be Queen’s first in Israel. The band, featuring only two original members – guitarist Brian May and drummer Roger Taylor – had performed only sporadically since the death of iconic lead singer Freddie Mercury of AIDS in 1991. Bass player Roger Deacon retired from performing in 1997.
But after May and Taylor first performed together with Lambert in 2009 on American Idol, where Lambert was runner-up, they decided to take the show on the road and have been touring regularly since 2011. Lambert is one of the few contemporary front men who can do Mercury’s legacy justice.
Last month, the band began a tour of 15 music festivals in some of Europe’s largest stadiums.
In a possible indication of what Queen fans can expect, in recent shows the band played songs like “Another One Bites the Dust,” “Fat Bottomed Girls,” “Killer Queen,” “Don’t Stop Me Now,” “Somebody to Love,” “Under Pressure,” “Crazy Little Thing Called Love,” “I Want to Break Free,” “Bohemian Rhapsody,” “We Will Rock You,” “We Are the Champions” and more.
Buzzfeed: Gifted With Blessings: 7 Israeli Arabs Who Make Israel a Better Place
You’ve noticed it: your friends in Israel sending Ramadan Kareem greetings all around on Facebook. No, your friends are not exceptional: Arabs make up 20% of the country’s population and Arabic is an official language in Israel. In honor of Ramadan, the month-long fasting period marking the first revelation of the Quran to Muhammad, we present you with seven Israeli Arabs bringing positive change in their country and shattering stereotypes.
Alaa Waheeb
IDF Major Waheeb, the highest ranked Muslim in the Israeli Army, got your back.
Alaa has toured around England during Israel Apartheid Week to speak to colleges about his life, career and experiences, all of which contradict the slanderous narrative of Israel as an apartheid state. Major Waheeb, thank you for your service!
Lucy Aharish
The honorary torchlighter for last year’s Independence Day ceremony (watch here), Lucy Aharish is the first Arab Muslim news anchor on Israeli Hebrew television.
The 36-year-old journalist is brave and outspoken, garnering international attention after a passionate discourse urging Palestinian leaders to take responsibility and stop spreading hatred. Lucy, your voice needs to be heard more!
The Leica Freedom Train
The Leica is the pioneer 35mm camera. It is a German product -- precise, minimalist, and utterly efficient. Behind its worldwide acceptance as a creative tool was a family-owned, socially oriented firm that during the Nazi era acted with uncommon grace, generosity and modesty. E. Leitz, Inc., designer and manufacturer of Germany's most famous photographic product, saved the company's Jews.
And Ernst Leitz II, the steely-eyed Protestant patriarch who headed the closely held firm as the Holocaust loomed across Europe, acted in such a way as to earn the title, "The Photography Industry's Schindler."
As soon as Adolf Hitler was named chancellor of Germany in 1933, Ernst Leitz II began receiving frantic calls from Jewish associates, asking for his help in getting them and their families out of the country. As Christians, Leitz and his family were, of course, immune to Nazi Germany's Nuremberg laws, which restricted the movement of Jews and limited their professional activities.
To help his Jewish workers and colleagues, Leitz quietly established what has become known among historians of the Holocaust as "The Leica Freedom Train," a covert means of allowing Jews to leave Germany in the guise of Leitz employees being assigned overseas.



We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
Share:

Clement Freud exposed as a child abuser



A shocking story has appeared on the Telegraph site this evening:
Sir Clement Freud, the former broadcaster and politician, was exposed last night as a paedophile who sexually abused girls as young as 10 for decades. 
Freud, who died in 2009, spent years abusing a girl who he brought up as a daughter, and violently raped a teenager while he was an MP. 
His widow, Lady Freud, has apologised to his victims, saying she is “shocked, deeply saddened and profoundly sorry” for what her husband of 58 years did to them.
It goes on to say:
Freud was unmasked as a child sex abuser after one of his victims contacted ITV’s Exposure documentary team, who also broke the story of Jimmy Savile’s paedophilia four years ago. 
Sylvia Woosley said Freud befriended her family in 1948, when he was working at a hotel in the South of France, and started abusing her when she was 10. 
Four years later, following a family crisis, her mother asked Freud and his wife Jill if they would look after Mrs Woosley, and she found herself living under the same roof as her abuser, being brought up as a daughter. The abuse continued until she managed to move away when she was 19. 
Another woman told ITV that Freud started abusing her in the 1970s, when she was 11, and eventually raped her when she was 18.
The story also makes links with the disappearance of Madeleine McCann. I have read before that he befriended her parents in the aftermath, but in following these celebrity abuse stories I have formed the view that a reference to the McCann case is a reliable sign that the author is a member of tinfoil bat brigade.

The 1970s and the Liberal Party of that era seem an even stranger, sicker place tonight.

Featured on Liberal Democrat VoiceLater. This story is also on the front page of the Daily Mail.

Later still. Exposure: Abused and Betrayed – A Life Sentence airs on ITV at 11:05pm on tomorrow.
Share:

Six of the Best 605

David Boyle gets to grips with Southern Railways.

"Children in the United States from the very earliest days of the Republic ... were raised with practices conceived in direct opposition to Old World notions of authoritarian power and natural hierarchy." Judith Warner reviews a history of American parenting from life on the frontier to the 'managed child'.

David Crystal says reports of the death of the full stop are exaggerated

Wilko Johnson discusses death, depression, cancer and Canvey Island with Every record tells a story.

"The interiors of Leighton House Museum in Holland Park are not only some of the most spectacularly beautiful in London; they are also the most completely unexpected." Let Nigel Andrew take you there.

David Runciman thinks England's reliance on Spurs players is a weakness: "The biggest reason Leicester finished ahead of Spurs is that their players spent a lot less time on the pitch (since the team had fewer commitments in other competitions) and so were able to hold their form to the very end. It’s not romantic, but it’s the truth: by the time you get to April and May, miles on the clock count for just as much as tactics and talent. And by the time you get to June and July, maybe for even more."
Share:

Israeli invention allows quadriplegics to move while upright

By now everyone has heard of the ReWalk, the Israeli invention that allows people whose legs are paralyzed to walk using a mechanical exoskeleton.

One of the ironies of the device is that its inventor, Amit Goffer, could never use the device himself because he is a full quadriplegic.

Now Goffer can view the world at eye-level as well, with a new Israeli invention, UPnRIDE:








We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
Share:

“To Listen to Arab Spokesmen One Might Think That They Had Been Cheated ... Because They Have Not Also Got Israel” (Daphne Anson)




Back in 2001, in a letter to the London Times (18 August), Baron Hylton, one of the representative British hereditary peers sitting in a House of Lords (which, by legislation enacted in 1998, consists mainly of life peers) proposed a confederation of Israel, Jordan, Palestine and Lebanon. In a spirited response published six days later, a British Sikh observed:
You cannot form a confederation between states with mutually exclusive values and a few common denominators witness how the “confederation” of Europe (the EU) is still reluctant to admit Turkey as a full partner.’
Nearly fifteen years on, and that observation is as valid as ever, a fact underlined by the insane immigration policies of Angela Merkel and others that will affect Europe’s demographic forever and may well see the unravelling of the great grotesque tyranny and gravy train for unaccountable unelected bureaucrats and venal superannuated politicians that the EU has become.
Only a policy of mutual co-existence and the realisation of the Muslim world that Israel, like Palestine, has the right to exist, could help to unknot the Middle East imbroglio,” Mr Randhir Singh Bains went on. Referring to Hylton’s assertion that Israel has been “a source of wars and friction ever since the Mandate” and his blaming Israel for, in Bains’s paraphrase, “forcing Palestinians to become refugees in their own country,” Mr Bains pointed out: “But the 20th century saw the creation of many states where original [sic] inhabitants were forced to become displaced persons. India and Pakistan were both created in areas where an indigenous population was forcefully uprooted to make way for the incoming immigrants. While India recognised Pakistan and made every effort to accommodate the Hindus and Sikhs displaced by the creation of a new Muslim state, Arab countries turned a blind eye to the plight of the displaced Palestinians with the expressed purpose of using them to threaten the existence of Israel.”
He was, of course, absolutely right.
In the words of a well-known British regional newspaper, the Western Morning News (7 October 1947):
‘One of the greatest mass migrations in history was yesterday nearing completion as a 75-mile convoy of uprooted non-Muslims continued to pour over the Pakistan border into India from the most fertile areas of the western Punjab. The whole convoy was expected to have crossed into the East Punjab within the next two or three days. The gigantic task of resettling them will begin. So vast is this moving mass of humanity – sustained by food dropped by air and by doctors flown to its aid – that it took eight days to pass a stationary point. The convoy included shopkeepers, artisans, doctors, lawyers, and once rich landlords. The old and sick died on the way, but the convoy moved on, blood from torn feet of the weary immigrants staining the dusty road.’
The Partition of British India in 1947 into a mainly Hindu state (India) and a Muslim state (Pakistan) demanded by the Muslims led by Muhammed Ali Jinnah was probably based on the Partition of Ireland in 1922 into a Protestant state (Northern Ireland, part of the United Kingdom) and a Catholic State (the Irish Free State, now the Republic of Ireland). The Peel Commission (1937) which first recommended the Partition of Palestine, probably has the Irish precedent in mind, as it appeared to work satisfactorily.
A guest post on my own blog by Professor William Rubinstein cross-posted to UK Media Watch (https://ukmediawatch.org/2010/09/20/in-contrast-to-palestine-partitions-population-transfers-and-no-demanded-right-of-return/ ) noted inter alia:
‘It is worth remembering that while in Palestine the Arabs opposed the creation of a largely Muslim Palestinian state, in India it was the Muslims who demanded Partition. Pakistan has no historical foundation whatever, and the very name Pakistan was invented by Muslim students and activists in London in 1931. The Partition of British India in 1947-48 was accomplished by bloodshed on an unimaginable scale, with probably 500,000 deaths in communal violence. Literally millions of Hindus and Muslims living in the “wrong” part of British India left for the other state. Karachi became known as a city of refugees.Yet – in contrast to Palestine – no one demands the “Right of Return” for these “refugees”, and in any case neither India nor Pakistan would be likely to allow any of their former residents back.
At that very time, too, vast population transfers were taking place in early post-war Europe. An estimated ten million Poles, Balts, and Russians fled to the West, ahead of the advancing Red Army, or, in some instances, were deliberately moved on. In Czechoslovakia, Eduard Beneš, the “good” Czech head of state between the end of the Nazi occupation in 1945 and the imposition of Stalinist rule in 1948, expelled three million Sudeten Germans from the Sudetenland in 1945-46. The Sudetenland is the rim area of what is now the Czech Republic whose demands (sparked by Hitler) for incorporation into the German Reich led to the Munich Crisis of 1938. After the war, the democratic Czech government was taking no more chances with a potential Fifth Column in the reborn state, and expelled the Sudeten Germans en masse. If there were any demands for their “Right of Return” these were unacknowledged. Most fled to West Germany, where, frankly, they were a lot better off than they would have been in a wretched Stalinist satellite regime, which is what Czechoslovakia became in 1948.
Professor Suzanne Rutland, formerly of Sydney but now of Jerusalem, recently attended a large US Holocaust Memorial Museum-sponsored conference on the theme of “Mass Violence and Memory” at an academic venue near Delhi last month at which this issue was considered.
The parallels between the end of British rule on the Indian sub-continent and Israel are clear, and some of these emerged during presentations. In both cases the British wanted out as quickly as possible; in both cases the decision was made only a few months before the British left – in India’s case, in March with the two new nations being formed in August 1947; with Palestine the UN Resolution was passed on 29 November 1947 and the British withdrew in May 1948. And in both cases there was religious violence – in India between Hindus and Muslims, and also involving Sikhs, and in Palestine between Muslims and Jews. The result for both was loss of life and displacement In addition close of a million Jews were displaced from the Arab world in the years following the 1948 war, so that today there are less than 4,000 Jews left in the Arab-Muslim world. With the millions of Hindu refugees the newly formed Indian government set to work to integrate them. In the period 1947-1951 camps were set up, loans for homes provided and the refugees assisted with finding employment. This was done with a minimum of drama – the government officials simply got to work. The same was true with the survivors of the Shoah and the refugees from the Arab world flooding into Israel. There was much hardship and suffering in both countries but eventually new lives were created. The integration of Muslims into Pakistan has been less successful but the world does not hear about this. There was further violence and dislocation leading to the creation of Bangladesh in 1971 whilst Kashmir has been a running sore with ongoing violence. Since 1995 there has been systematic ethnic cleansing there with 200,000 Hindu refugees fleeing the area. Yet the world is silent.”
There was, of course, a sharp reminder of Muslim violence towards Hindus and other minorities last week, with the butchery of an elderly Hindu priest and the news that 750 people from vulnerable minority communities are fleeing from Bangladesh into India every day. (http://www.dw.com/en/bangladeshi-hindus-seeking-safety-in-india/a-19310941)
No outcry, of course, from the obsessed and oblivious Israel-haters.
There is, of course, singularly one set of persons displaced by the population transfers and partitions of the twentieth century who remain “refugees” today, and those are those Arabs, long since rebranded “Palestinians,” whom the surrounding Arabs nations, having failed to destroy Israel by arms from 1948 onwards, have deliberately let fester in refugee camps as a cudgel with which to beat Israel.
Not long after the Six Day War, Arthur Balfour’s nephew Robert Balfour, the 3rd Earl of Balfour (1902-68), justifiably observed:
“Most of the present Arab countries were given their freedom after the 1914-18 War, or after the 1939-45 War ... Yet to listen to Arab spokesmen one might think that they had been cheated ... because they have not also got Israel. Israel is only .2 per cent of the land where Arab States have been established. Surely no fair-minded man can begrudge the Jews their own promised land when it is remembered that for every two acres that went to make up Israel, 1,000 acres became Arab.... Why is there an Arab refugee problem? The oil-rich countries have the money. There is no shortage of land, and the Israelis have the technical knowledge to show how it could be developed and made fertile. Bring those things together and the problem could be solved.”
The unique status accorded by the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA; established in 1949) to the displaced Palestinian Arabs of 1948, regarding their patrilineal descendants as refugees, feeds the Palestinian Arabs’ sense of grievance and fuels biased “analysis” such as this rather outrageous piece in 2010 (http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-11104284) by the BBC’s Martin Asser (who left the Corporation last year for pastures new). Moreover, having a vested interest in the continuation of the Arab-Israeli dispute, UNRWA is a massive and seemingly immovable impediment to peace. UNRWA’s original brief was to "carry out direct relief and works programmes in collaboration with local governments"; "consult with the Near Eastern governments concerning measures to be taken preparatory to the time when international assistance for relief and works projects is no longer available", and plan for the time when relief was no longer needed. It subsequently took it upon itself to extend its mandate to embrace the provision of relief, human development and protection services to Palestine refugees and persons displaced by the 1967 conflict, encompassing the Disputed Territories (no, it did not use that term!), Jordan, Lebanon, and Syria. Periodically renewed by the UN General Assembly, the current mandate expires in a year’s time.
‘As of 14 September 2015, 136 of the 193 United Nations member states have been playing the PLO name-game change [from Palestinian Authority] and recognised the “State of Palestine”. These 136 States now need to answer two questions: 1. How can any person living in his own country still be classified as a refugee? 2. Shouldn’t the 760,000 registered Palestinian Arab refugees living in the West Bank have their refugee status revoked and be resettled and fully integrated among their fellow Palestinian Arabs? Claiming the trappings of Statehood – whilst segregating its citizens into two different classes – is a recipe for continuing tension and future conflict. Change the name – change the game – but be prepared to accept the consequences.’
“In effect, UNRWA has come to depend on the refugee problem itself. While the refugees benefit from its services, the organization benefits even more from the refugees. They are, of course, the organization’s raison d’être. UNRWA has no incentive whatsoever to resolve the Palestinian refugee problem, since doing so would render it obsolete. As a result, the agency not only perpetuates the refugee problem, but has, in many ways, exacerbated it. In doing so, it has made Israeli-Palestinian peace all but impossible, argued Asaf Romirowsky, executive director of Scholars for Peace in the Middle East, inter alia two years ago. (http://www.thetower.org/article/the-real-palestinian-refugee-crisis/ )
UNRWA’s role in perpetuating and even expanding the refugee problem is a complex one; but, more than anything else, it is the result of the agency’s own definition of a Palestinian refugee—which is unique in world history. The standard definition of a refugee, which applies in every case except that of the Palestinians, includes only those actually displaced in any given conflict. UNRWA has defined a Palestinian refugee as anyone whose “normal place of residence was Palestine during the period 1 June 1946 to 15 May 1948 and who lost both home and means of livelihood as a result of the 1948 conflict.” But it has also continually expanded this definition, now stating “the children or grandchildren of such refugees are eligible for agency assistance if they are (a) registered with UNRWA, (b) living in the area of UNRWA’s operations, and (c) in need.” As a result, the number of official Palestinian refugees—according to UNRWA— has expanded almost to the point of absurdity. In its relentless defense of its own unique definition of a Palestinian refugee and its complete refusal to reconsider its demand for the “right of return,” it buttresses and perpetuates the Palestinians’ eternal sense of victimhood and the refugees’ narrative. This narrative accepts no responsibility whatsoever for the refugee problem, blaming it entirely on Israel, regardless of the decisions and actions of Palestinians and their leaders. Due to its economic and institutional interests in doing so, UNRWA must continue to maintain and even expand the refugee problem until the refugees’ complete and total repatriation and compensation. This demand for the “right of return” is clear and absolute and has not changed to this day. Over and over again, it has torpedoed any possibility of an agreement between Israel and the Palestinians... It appears that peace cannot be achieved without compromise on the “right of return,” and there can be no such compromise until UNRWA is either substantially reformed or entirely dismantled. 
Amen to that.



We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
Share:

An open-air service at St John's, Boughton



I thought I had finished with the old village green at Boughton.

But Getty Images has this picture of an open-air service held amid the ruins of St John's some time in the 1930s.

No doubt there are ghosts looking on if you study it closely.
Share: