The independent inquiry into the handling of allegations made against Greville Janner which was commissioned last year by the Director of Public Prosecutions issued its report today.
That inquiry was conducted by the retired High Court Judge Sir Richard Henriques.
You can download the full report from the Crown Prosecution Service website, and the Guardian has a summary of his its findings:
The report found:
- The decision not to charge Janner in 1991 was wrong because there was enough evidence against him to provide a realistic prospect of conviction for offences of indecent assault and buggery. In addition, the police investigation was inadequate and no charging decision should have been taken by the CPS until the police had undertaken further inquiries.
- In 2002, allegations against Janner were not supplied by the police to the CPS and so no prosecution was possible. This merits investigation by the IPCC.
The evidence of the first complainant against Janner, who gave evidence in the trial of Frank Beck in 1991, is particularly strong.
- There was sufficient evidence to prosecute Janner in 2007 for indecent assault and buggery. He should have been arrested and interviewed and his home searched.
The Guardian says:
These allegations related to 1975 when, it was alleged, the young boy from a children’s home met Janner after the then MP performed magic tricks.
The alleged victim, known as Complainant One, said he was quickly befriended by Janner and was sexually abused and raped repeatedly. The complainant went to a wedding with the peer’s family, it was alleged, and it was only two decades later in 2014 that a subsequent police investigation found there was film footage of Complainant One at the event.
According to the report, the prosecuting authorities discussed the possibility of arresting and interviewing the complainant in relation to charges of perverting the course of justice.ITV News interviewed Bernard Greaves, who was part of Beck's defence team, about the case this evening.
