Showing posts with label Twitter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Twitter. Show all posts

#mardyVardy wins Hashtag of the Day



In its Pass Notes style, the Guardian tells the story of Lee Chapman:
Chapman is a postman who looks like Jamie Vardy. He is also a diehard Leicester City fan and came to minor prominence when the team hauled him on to the victory bus to celebrate with his beloved Foxes in the wake of their Premier League triumph. 
That’s nice. Yes, it was. 
Is it not still? It was nice for a while. A lookalike agency spotted the photos the team posted from the bus and offered Chapman work. The Royal Mail has given him six months off to pursue the opportunity. 
That is REALLY nice! He’s got a verified Twitter account with more than 3,500 followers, where he offers fans the chance to make video messages with him and posts pictures of himself in full Leicester kit with them at events. Rumours swirl about a Celebrity Big Brother appearance and UK comedy tour with other lookalikes. 
Sound, hopefully lucrative, moves. But Chapman says that Vardy – and his new wife, Rebekah Nicholson, have blocked him on Twitter and Instagram. 
What?! No?! Why? Vardy’s agent reportedly sent Chapman a text message warning him not to do anything that would put any of Vardy’s endorsement deals at risk.
When this story was tweeted, someone thought of the masterly hashtag #mardyVardy.

'Mardy', for the uninitiated, is a good East Midlands word meaning something like spoilt, childish or sulky.
Share:

Why Twitter doesn't work, Labour won't win and the Lib Dems are irrationally cheerful



It's hard to have sensible conversations with people from other parties on Twitter. Too often, name-calling or petty point-scoring takes over from rational discussion early in the proceedings.

Labour activists find it particular hard to talk to Conservatives because they have convinced themselves that the Labour Party is the fount of virtue. Therefore, they reason, anyone who votes Tory must be an evil person.

Let's call it the Hesmondhalgh Doctrine.

It's predominance in Corbyn's Labour Party mean that it cannot talk to the many voters who have no great love for the Conservative Party but suspect that it is more to be trusted from an economic point of view than Labour.

Meanwhile many Liberal Democrats, when they have been traumatised by the result of the last general election, shrugged, declared a #libdemfightback and carried on as if not much had happened.

An article in the New York Times by David Brooks puts a finger on the social changes that are behind these phenomena.

He writes:
In healthy societies, people live their lives within a galaxy of warm places. They are members of a family, neighborhood, school, civic organization, hobby group, company, faith, regional culture, nation, continent and world. Each layer of life is nestled in the others to form a varied but coherent whole. 
But starting just after World War II, America’s community/membership mind-set gave way to an individualistic/autonomy mind-set. The idea was that individuals should be liberated to live as they chose, so long as they didn’t interfere with the rights of others. ... 
The individualist turn had great effects but also accumulating downsides. By 2005, 47 percent of Americans reported that they knew none or just a few of their neighbors by name. There’s been a sharp rise in the number of people who report that they have no close friends to confide in.
Brooks cites Marc J. Dunkelman, author of The Vanishing Neighbor, as arguing that
people are good at tending their inner-ring relationships - their family and friends. They’re pretty good at tending to outer-ring relationships - their hundreds of Facebook acquaintances, their fellow progressives, or their TED and Harley fans. 
But Americans spend less time with middle-ring township relationships - the PTA, the neighborhood watch.
These middle-ring relationships sound like Edmund Burke's little platoon and Dunkelman sounds very like Robert Putnam, whose Bowling Alone we all read at the turn of the century.

What has this to do with the state of party politics?

Brooks continues:
With fewer sources of ethnic and local identity, people ask politics to fill the void. Being a Democrat or a Republican becomes their ethnicity. People put politics at the center of their psychological, emotional and even spiritual life. This is asking too much of politics.
Once politics becomes your ethnic and moral identity, it becomes impossible to compromise, because compromise becomes dishonor. If you put politics at the center of identity, you end up asking the state to eclipse every social authority but itself. Presidential campaigns become these gargantuan two-year national rituals that swallow everything else in national life. 
If we’re going to salvage our politics, we probably have to shrink politics, and nurture the thick local membership web that politics rests within.
He goes on to say we should "scale back the culture of autonomy," which makes my liberal hackles rise and suggests Brooks too is in danger of wanting the state to eclipse every other social authority.

As a liberal I believe in individuality, and we express our individuality through the groups we choose to join. There must be a liberal route to the revival of social bonds.

But the idea that we are asking too much of politics is one I have long been toying with.

Political activists do tend to make their political affiliation central to their identity. More than that, they find their social life, their friends, even their partners, through their activism.

That party membership is such a minority taste now suggests that the 19th-century model of political parties we still embrace is hopelessly outdated.

Yet no politician has the vision or overweening ambition to wrench it apart and allowing something more attuned to our needs today to take its place.
Share:

Just because they retweet you, it doesn't mean they have understood you


It's nice to be widely retweeted, but does it mean that all those people have understood what you have said?

A new paper highlighted by the British Psychological Society's Research Digest blog suggests it does not:
The researchers based at Peking University and Cornell University say that the very option to share or repost social media items is distracting, and what's more, the decision to repost is itself a further distraction and actually makes it less likely that readers will have properly understood the very items that they chose to share.
You can read about the two studies on the Research Digest, but I have observed a small example of this phenomenon myself today.

Last night I blogged about Desborough Town Council and its decision to increase its precept by more than 400 per cent.

If you read that post you will see I express some sympathy for this decision - "If ever a town gave the visitor the impression that it needs some money spent on it, that town is Desborough" - yet every person who has retweeted my tweets about this post appears to be a Labour supporter.

Did they even click through to the post before retweeting?
Share:

Six of the Best 573

Mark Valladares asks if using your preferred definition of liberalism a means to suppress reasoned dissent.

"According to a 2015 Prison Reform Trust review, children and young people who are, or have been, in care were more than five times more likely to be involved in the criminal justice system. The most recent inspection report of Medway in 2014, which houses 12 to 17-year-olds who have been remanded or sentenced to detention, found 45% of youngsters there had care histories." Jameel Hadi writes on institutional abuse.

Patrick Barkham reports that more than 10% of children in England haven’t been to a natural environment in past 12 months.

"Trees in Leicester reduce concentrations of road traffic emissions in the city by up to 7% and have a “regionally beneficial impact on air quality”, results from an academic research project have found." Important (and more widely applicable) research from Michael Holder.

Twitter just killed its own product, says Austin Rathe.

Curious British Telly on the short Blue Peter career of Michael Sundin.
Share:

Rod Duncan on steampunk and The Custodian of Marvels

"Originally it was a literary genre. But it has become something far broader. Go to a steampunk festival and you’ll see people who have taken the aesthetic and applied it to fashion, model making, tabletop gaming, visual arts, music, stage performance and more."

The Leicester novelist Rod Duncan is talking about steampunk, and he is an enthusiast for it.

"Lincoln’s Weekend at the Asylum festival describes itself as the biggest steampunk gathering in Europe. It is hard to describe, but joyful to witness. Thousands of people turn up, dressed in extraordinary costumes. It is definitely worth a visit."

Which surprises me a little, as he was originally known as a crime novelist. When we met I asked him how this shift to steampunk came about.

He told me: “There’s this ideal career concept that lots of writers start off with. You write a novel, which gets snapped up by a grateful publisher, who pays enough for you to live off while you write the next in the series in the same genre. Your audience builds and… well, there are movie deals."

"My career path was different. To start with, I wrote several novels before I got a publishing deal. The first one to get picked up was a crime story. So I wrote more in the same broad genre. But when my original publishing deal was over, I found myself once again writing and failing to sell. At which point I decided to give up writing novels. Forever.

"Sooner or later though, I was bound to be drawn back. It would have made more commercial sense for me to write another contemporary crime novel. But I think I’ve probably admitted by now that this was never a realistic commercial proposition.

"The story that grabbed me first was an adventure set in a Victorianesque alternate history. It was called The Bullet Catcher's Daughter. Happily people liked it. It got published and even found its way onto the shortlist for the Philip K. Dick award."

The Bullet Catcher’s Daughter turned out to be the first in a trilogy: The Fall of the Gas-Lit Empire. The third in the series, The Custodian of Marvels, is published next month. So I asked Rod about the world these books are set in.

"The alternate history of the Gas-Lit Empire branched from our more familiar history some two centuries ago. The exact divergence point is a secret you’ll need to read the books to unravel. But it is clear from the start that there was a Luddite inspired revolution, which ended with the partition of Great Britain into the Anglo-Scottish Republic and the Kingdom of England and Southern Wales.

"The new republics of France, America and Anglo-Scotland then came together to establish a treaty of mutual security and set up an International Patent Office to restrict the development of science and technology deemed ‘detrimental to the common man’.

"Two centuries have passed since then, but the progress of science and technology has been held back and distorted. That is the world in which the stories are set.”

And the Gas-Lit Empire turns out to have strong Leicester connections.

"The border between the Kingdom and the Republic is an east-west line across England. It bisects the city of Leicester, which has subsequently boomed as a haven for smugglers and ne'er-do-wells of all kinds.

"The stories are told by a refugee from the Kingdom, who lives in North Leicester, where she ekes out a living as a private investigator. The mysteries she investigates start small. But soon she finds herself caught up with the Patent Office and the secret history that sparked the creation of the Gas-Lit Empire."

Rod told me that the word ‘steampunk’ was first suggested by the American author K.W. Jeter in a letter published in Locus magazine in April 1987. Jeter offered it as a term to describe science-fiction stories set in worlds powered by steam technology.

I asked him if he saw any social or political significance in the movement the term it has given rise to.

"That’s a really interesting question. I’m not aware of a political ideology underpinning this diverse community. But some of the social features of steampunk culture are an unbridled outpouring of creativity and a willingness to project a flamboyant persona, even when others view it as eccentric. You can add to that a welcoming of diversity and an unusual spread of generations from the very young to the elderly.

"Some people have suggested that steampunk culture is problematic for its apparent glorification of the Victorian age without sufficient acknowledgement of factors like colonialism, class and sexual inequality.

"That seems unfair to me. The steampunk community is politically diverse, but it probably encompasses a greater understanding of the social and political problems of the Victorian age than is present in the general population. And it is certainly the case that the friction and dangers arising from social inequalities deliver a narrative drive to my own work."

One of the things that intrigues me about published authors these days is the use they make of the net and social media. Are they a threat or a further opportunity? So I asked Rod about this.

"My novels are published by Angry Robot Books - a small but dynamic and thoroughly modern company. Instead of being based in London or New York, their headquarters are here in the Midlands. But they operate internationally and their staff are spread across the globe. The Internet, social media and online networks of fans are central to this business model.

"As the name implies, Angry Robot specialises in science fiction and fantasy. They really understand those genres and their audiences. Everything about this company has impressed me. I can’t speak of them highly enough.

"I do use social media myself - primarily to make connections and build relationships. I’ve noticed some writers using Twitter and Facebook to spam adverts for their books. I’ve been told by some that this works, since books are sold as a result. But I don’t much like it.

"I like Twitter because it enables readers to easily get in touch. Somehow sending a tweet to a writer is less intimidating than finding their address and composing an email. I get lots of feedback in this way, which I really value. I guess, as a spin-off from that process of relationship building it may be that I’ll sell more books. But if that ever came to be my main motivation, I think my Twitter contacts would be able to sense it. Ironically, I’d probably sell fewer."

Rod’s Twitter handle is @RodDuncan and he asked me to encourage readers to send him a tweet.

"I use my Facebook page to share articles and news – things I couldn’t say in 140 characters. People who have opted to ‘like’ the page are in a different category from my contacts on Twitter. I assume they are more invested in the books, and I write the articles accordingly. The content will tend to be more directly about my work. But the same rule applies as with Twitter – I don’t see it as a platform for selling. I use it to generate a conversation about the process of writing, new developments, thoughts and ideas."

And what about being interviewed by blogs like Liberal England?

"I always try to be as candid as possible and to give away as much as I can. Yes, I want to raise awareness of my novels. And yes, I hope I’ll sell more copies as a result."

By the way, did you know I’ve a novel coming out next month?”
Share:

Market Harborough Conservatives and a lot of tits


Nick Rushton, the Conservative leader of Leicestershire County Council, has just issued the following statement:
“My Twitter account was hacked by someone with malicious intent. Whoever has done this changed my password, as I was unable to log onto it for a considerable period of time. I have reset my account and passwords. I take this kind of issue very seriously and have reported it to the police.”
It comes after a Guido Fawkes post that showed Nick Rushton's Twitter account was following a number of "risque" accounts.

You can see some of them in the image above, which I have shamelessly stolen from Guido's blog.

It is obvious that the hacker had malicious intent. As well as following Huge Boob Pics and ILikeBootyDaily, he followed Market Harborough Conservatives.

Later. I have been blocked!
Share:

Keith Vaz has deleted his Twitter account


A surprising move from such a publicity-hungry politician.

Featured on Liberal Democrat VoiceLater. A lot of people on Twitter are claiming he has deleted his Facebook account too.

Even later. He's back.
Share:

Six of the Best 563

The Liberal Democrats should cut their spending by moving their headquarters out of London, argues Simon McGrath.

"Pickering, North Yorkshire, pulled off protection by embracing the very opposite of what passes for conventional wisdom. On its citizens’ own initiative, it ended repeated inundation by working with nature, not against it." Geoffrey Lean explains how one town that beat the floods.

Terence Fane-Saunders dissects Oliver Letwin's inadequate apology.

James O'Malley wants the left to stop retweeting bullshit.

"If it looks completely at home in this northern European setting, that's because a mosque has stood here, roughly 20 minutes' drive south-west of the Lithuanian capital, Vilnius, since 1558." Tharik Hussain on the Muslims of the Baltic.

The Downstairs Lounge celebrates the career of Kenneth Horne.
Share: